In a world where genetic
engineering, in-vitro fertilisation, embryo transplants and artificial insemination are
common, the thoroughbred industry is the last bastion in animal breeding of the
traditional method of "natural service". Stud Book Rules laid down hundreds of
years ago in England are still rigidly adhered to all over the world. The penalty for
breaching them is that progeny produced outside the regulations cannot be registered as
recognised thoroughbreds. There is a saying which
goes "all progress is the result of unreasonable men". One of Australia's most
prominent breeders, Jim Fleming of Tyreel Stud, has taken a step which many in the
industry believe to be most unreasonable. He has dared to breed a foal from his
outstanding mare Eau D'Etoile and have it carried to birth in a surrogate mare, knowing
full well that the resulting foal would probably not be registered under existing Stud
Book Rules.
Eau D'Etoile is arguably one of the best mares in the
Australian Stud Book. By Sir Tristram, she is the dam of Group winners Filante, Bint
Marscay, Temple Fire, Eau D'Escay and Kenny's Best Pal. Tragically she has been unable to
carry a foal full term since a ceasarean section in 1997.
In the 2000 breeding season, Fleming consulted noted equine
reproductive expert Angus McKinnon of the Goulburn Valley Equine Hospital, who among other
achievments had been responsible for the world's first horse born from in-vitro
fertilisation.
Mindful of the Stud Book regulations prohibiting artificial
insemination, Eau D'Etoile was served by Sunline's sire, Desert Sun who stands at Eliza
Park Stud, owned by Jim Fleming's son Lee. On two occasions, the mare produced an embryo
which did not survive due to the scarring in her uterus. On the third try, McKinnon
recommended transferring the embryo to a surrogate mare. This procedure was adopted and a
live foal was born from the surrogate on 17th November 2001. Subsequent DNA testing has
proved that genetically the foal's sire is Desert Sun and its dam is Eau D'Etoile.
Unfortunately for Fleming, when he first notified John
Digby, the Keeper of the Stud Book, in March 2001 and subsequently after the foal's birth,
that it had been produced via embryo transplant, the response was that the foal would be
unregisterable.
The particular Stud Book regulation that Digby invoked is
Rule 1.9 :-
"A foal is only eligible for inclusion in the
Australian Stud Book or the Australian Non Thoroughbred Register if it is the produce of a
natural service, which is the physical mounting of a mare by a stallion, and a natural
gestation takes place in and delivery is from the body of the mare in which the foal is
conceived."
One could take the view that the Stud Book Rules are
primarily designed to ensure that registered thoroughbreds are of verifiable parentage.
The recent introduction by the Australian Stud Book of DNA testing is able to prove
conclusively both parents of any horse. Therefore it is arguable that regulations which
relate primarily to provable parentage are not necessary if DNA testing can establish the
true genetic identity of each animal born. On this basis alone, a fair proportion of Stud
Book Rules could be eliminated.
In this case, there appears to be no dispute that Desert
Sun covered Eau D'Etoile by natural service. Digby's argument is that there was no natural
gestation in the mare and delivery was not from her body.
A smart lawyer may perhaps be able to make a case that
natural gestation did in fact take place in the body of Eau D'Etoile (for a period of 7
days according to McKinnon). The foal was "delivered" from Eau D'Etoile to the
surrogate at that point and the rest of the pregnancy took place in the surrogate. Nowhere
in the Stud Book Rules does it specifically refer to the whole of the gestation period
having to take place in the one mare.
Tyreel Stud manager John Vincent pointed out that studs
often introduce surrogate or foster mothers shortly after birth when the natural mother
has died or suffered injury during foaling. Except for the blood supply which the natural
mother supplies during pregnancy, practically everything else the foal requires is
provided by the foster mare including the all important colostrum. Fostering is perfectly
acceptable and there is no Rule which even mentions it in the Stud Book regulations.
Rather than rely on fine legal interpretation of the Stud
Book Rules however, Fleming's view is that Rule 1.9 is an unreasonable restraint of his
ability to trade as a thoroughbred breeder and thus in breach of the Australian Trade
Practices Act. The matter seems destined to end up in court as the Australian Stud Book
says it is obliged to observe the Rules of the International Stud Book Committee, which
prohibit the use of artificial breeding techniques. The potential conflict between
Australian Federal law and the "gentleman's agreement" of the ISBC looks set to
make a fascinating legal battle, which has the potential to blow the winds of change
through the time honoured customs of the global thoroughbred industry.
Predictably, Fleming's actions have attracted criticism
from the Australian breeding industry. Richard Turnley, President of Thoroughbred Breeders
Australia said that the TBA opposed the registration of the embryo transfer foal :-
"The rules adopted by the International Stud Book
Committee do not permit the registration of foals that are born as a result of an embryo
transfer and as the Australian Stud Book is a member of the International Stud Book
Committee it is bound by these international rules. If the Keeper did decide to register
this foal the decision would jeopardize the international recognition of the Australian
Stud Book and all the horses in it."
Ironically, he went on to point out that John Digby himself
had "recently forwarded a discussion paper on the subject of embryo transfers to the
International Breeders Meeting held in Kilkenny, Ireland. The meeting ..... unanimously
rejected any proposals to register any foal born as a result of an embryo transfer and
this motion was forwarded to the International Stud Book Committee who also confirmed that
the rules would remain unaltered."
One can only assume that Digby's paper was prompted at
least in part by his knowledge of Fleming's project.
On a more conciliatory note, Turnley stated :-
"It must be noted that the TBA is not opposing the
registration on the basis that there is anything inherently wrong with the technique of
embryo transfers This technique is widely and successfully carried out with other
animals."
Continued Page 2 |